: By contrast, it is difficult to report on Trump's business conflicts b/c so much source material comes from obscure overseas acts.
-
-
Replying to @ericgeller
: And much of the material predated the election, making iterative coverage less likely. Compare to emails, w/ new docs regularly.
3 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
-
Replying to @zeynep @ericgeller
I wrote this before the election. Tweeted endlessly about it. It wasn't a partisan concern. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/05/opinion/what-were-missing-while-we-obsess-over-john-podestas-email.html …
3 replies 3 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
: It's all about framing/context. WikiLeaks releases, esp during an election, are newsworthy events in themselves.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ericgeller
Newsworthy, yes. A few things. Getting stuck on trivia part at the expense of significant issues before a real election? Nope.
2 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
: It's not a zero-sum game. Different reporters cover different things. WikiLeaks is squarely within my beat. Trump biz is not.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ericgeller
If there weren't enough reporters on Trump biz, maybe your editors should have said, trivia can wait for after the elections?
3 replies 3 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
: I can't have this conversation with you if you consider news that doesn't fit your political worldview "trivia."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ericgeller
That is an absolutely false accusation and maybe an excuse for yourself. Inside baseball and process stuff was trivia.
2 replies 3 retweets 9 likes
I would have said the same thing if Trump campaign internal emails got the same coverage.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.