Headline is misleading. Setting this up as a dilemma is what loses elections. That said, the story is scarier. People are sleepwalking.https://twitter.com/nytpolitics/status/799228166602559488 …
-
-
Look, pre-election explainers with glib headlines incorrectly using regression to claim economic issues and race were separate were wrong.
-
Now, there is the post-election pieces setting up false dilemmas. To err is human. But don't listen to people who got *everything* wrong.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think there has been research which demonstrates this. Published it a few years back.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Over-simplification of so-called WWC - and other groups, for that matter - is disturbing.
@zeynepThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't think the argument is no portion of the wwc would support both, but not enough eps given data on racial resentment
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not that shaky. There is enough evidence that a plurality of the WWC doesn't vote its economic interests. Funny that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Plus, all categories of white people went for Trump. Even millenials. Even white women with degrees, who should know better. Funny.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.