Of course not. What I'm railing against is self-induced blindness to realities of the (razor-thin) Trump coalition.https://twitter.com/sarahleah1/status/796713941795799040 …
-
-
have you seen that graphic of counties that voted for Trump far more than Romney? It's ALL in the Midwest and Appalachia
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
, I am preparing to slow down on Twitter for serious topics. Math illiteracy bad stats, brevity, know-it-all-ism...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
At present, downsides of social media seem to have overwhelmed the benefits.
@zeynep With apologies for "thinking out loud" on your feed.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
so much appreciating your rigour & attention to really understanding the problem right now. it's immense public service - thank you!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@fawfulfan are there adjusted cost of living numbers? 50k in MO means more than 50 in Boston.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
esp if mind changing includes deciding to stay home.
New conversation -
-
-
Republican coalition always had more high-income: hence higher averages. What is key is what changed: Trump peeled off some poorer people.
-
10% of people who approve NOW of Obama voted for Trump. That's 5% of the vote—Obama has high approval. If Clinton had them, landslide.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@fawfulfan if nothing better is available, always look at the median.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.