Uncurated dumps like the Podesta emails are a threat to healthy dissent, even a form of censorship. Me for the NYT: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/05/opinion/what-were-missing-while-we-obsess-over-john-podestas-email.html …pic.twitter.com/ajuslzuYOO
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
also it is terrible for transparency because it signals that sensitive things should not be put in email now
I respectfully disagree. I think this piece does a good job arguing for the value of the leak. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/31/the-podesta-emails-show-who-runs-america-and-how-they-do-it?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Tweet …
.@ShriekingNoises @SeviliyahCLK It's a very idealized take, not what actually happened. What you see most mass hacks is noise & confusion.
Its not one persons- its Clintons entire Team! And- Hypocrisy is when u stay quite in 2008/Bush Documents and now..
try to be cautious about being unfair towards. clinton
Seems emails are a lot like conversation, its privilege is only as good as the ability to protect it.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.