Uncurated dumps like the Podesta emails are a threat to healthy dissent, even a form of censorship. Me for the NYT: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/05/opinion/what-were-missing-while-we-obsess-over-john-podestas-email.html …pic.twitter.com/ajuslzuYOO
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
don’t see how you suffer from not writing shit about people behind their back, doesn’t seem onerous either
also doesn’t seem necessarily true that the powerful are all that adaptable to new tech reality compared to insurgents
Such a great insight.
actually it's "dont write a letter you wouldn't want to see in print." Same ethical parameters, different technology.
old, old netiquette: "Don't post anything you wouldn't want to see on a grocery bulletin board."
It might get more strange. @ezraklein Tweet about swapping votes gets even more hard to quantify if money is involved.
@andreachalupa need for an enterprise @snapchat? :)
Don't use the cloud to organize dissent is an act of disempowerment.
Before the election I argued, in vain, that uncurated dumps including personal data would structurally threaten dissent, not really power.pic.twitter.com/bnk1Afheiw
: Yes you did. You were very vocal. People thought you were overreacting, but in fact you rightful sounded the alarms.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.