Uncurated dumps like the Podesta emails are a threat to healthy dissent, even a form of censorship. Me for the NYT: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/05/opinion/what-were-missing-while-we-obsess-over-john-podestas-email.html …pic.twitter.com/ajuslzuYOO
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
2-"Don't write an email you don't want to see on CNN" is the new "don't wear a miniskirt, then". Powerful will adapt, dissent will suffer.
don’t see how you suffer from not writing shit about people behind their back, doesn’t seem onerous either
infatuation with “opsec” yet another example of technical solutions to sociopolitical problems
idk. Once upon a time, so were padlocks.
Not what I was implying. Dissent already has some good opsec. Phishing, 2FA are well understood in many activist circles.
The only point I was making is that Podesta didn't have even those basics because his privilege taught him it wasn't necessary.
That is probably a correct assessment. Bearing in mind that the Soviet underworld had hijacked the internet before it went public.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.