Uncurated dumps like the Podesta emails are a threat to healthy dissent, even a form of censorship. Me for the NYT: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/05/opinion/what-were-missing-while-we-obsess-over-john-podestas-email.html …pic.twitter.com/ajuslzuYOO
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Is just not that harmful. What is harmful in the hacks is 1) they are stolen goods. 2) without context you have curation. /2
Does this extend to the Romney 47 percent comment?
A message is being created and a platform is being given to that message when it is stolen, omits context, and then used for harm /3
I disagree. It may not demotivate the really ruthless or sneaky ones, who think they can beat it, but the scrutiny /1
Marginalized people have always faced defamation/threats for engaging w/politics. What's novel here is that Podesta is anything but.
Alternate take: regardless of your privilege, engaging in electoral politics now requires that you take opsec seriously.
You know what political sabotage is; rigging the primary against a fully public funded nominee for a corporate backed nominee.
@zeyneppic.twitter.com/FqMGaSCYQ5
According to @zeynep, we were better off not knowing the political chicanery taking place behind scenes at DNC. We should just fall in line.
They don't see powerful as people like them. Also, this one is done to a woman who we never think have the same rights as men
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.