Uncurated dumps like the Podesta emails are a threat to healthy dissent, even a form of censorship. Me for the NYT: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/05/opinion/what-were-missing-while-we-obsess-over-john-podestas-email.html …pic.twitter.com/ajuslzuYOO
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
By the way: my argument on why Podesta-like hack & mass dumps are harmful to a healthy democracy isn't about who did the hack—Russia or not.
Then probably something about too.much.transparency? Healthy democracies usually don't fail because transparency, rather darkness.
Very hard to evaluate asymmetric data dumps.
And who will select the Curator? Oh, I see.
You seen entirely untroubled by the fact that none of these emails, not one, discusses better public policy or helping people.
Is the subtext "the public is too stupid to sort through it all?"
No. Too much information becomes confusing; little stuff and gossip dominates, buries important things.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.