Don’t I see that actual number in the table? It’s a whole table of percentages.
-
-
So, should original study (of which I have seen precisely one table) use asterisks instead of values in those cells?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If the data don’t support reporting the value, then the value prob shouldn’t be in the paper, either? Is that fair?
-
No, data is fine. It's the subgroup comparison. I found reasonable explanation.https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/24/very-bad-analysis-of-a-2008-email-is-donald-trumps-new-excuse-for-why-hes-losing/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Overall, this exchange is confirming that Twitter is good only for sharing links and not most discussions.
-
More characters would help! I responded because something erroneous had gone Twitter viral so I ended up seeing it.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks for the many tweets, Zeynep.
I'll check them out after I finish this piece on white supremacist terrorist attacksThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Which, by the way, is why pollsters "oversample"—see more here:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/24/very-bad-analysis-of-a-2008-email-is-donald-trumps-new-excuse-for-why-hes-losing/ …
-
So hope this is clearer!
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.