I would definitely not write a broad analysis using one data point. But I dont think academic studies should be suppressed
-
-
You are effectively comparing zero to zero, statistically speaking, and when I point this out, it's suppression?!?
-
No, the part where you said it shouldn't be discussed at all is. I think it's great to debate the limitations of stats.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is not my report. It is from UNO. The reason I put the data in the tweet is so people could interpret it themselves.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's what
@sarahkendzior pulled yesterday too, except she used word "censor" rather than "suppression"@Chanders -
Well, yes. You can see the many tweets ordering me to delete it. As email filled with death threats over not.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Again, had I written an article instead of tweeting a data set, I could understand the rage. But it is a tweet of report.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I agree. With N=12, 17% and 2% are not distinguishable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.