They're now blatantly lying to the public, which is why they haven't identified a single one.https://twitter.com/ThisWeekABC/status/790183588234801152 …
-
-
Replying to @ggreenwald
Glenn Greenwald Retweeted This Week
It's slimy enough to insinuate the emails are fake when you know they're not. This is outright lyinghttps://twitter.com/ThisWeekABC/status/790183588234801152 …
Glenn Greenwald added,
509 replies 3,210 retweets 4,018 likes -
Replying to @ggreenwald
Is it slimy to fool people into thinking ordinary people's emails are AKP government emails, when you know they are not?
4 replies 13 retweets 35 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
I'm not the spokesman for WL, so if you want to find someone who reflexively defends what they do, look elsewhere.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ggreenwald
I know. I'm just pointing out what happens when the intermediary is unreliable and doesn't care about vetting.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
I think WL's record in terms of publishing accurate documents is more reliable than many serious, established media outlets.
4 replies 5 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @ggreenwald
I'm not spokesperson for established media outlets, either, but most don't have that much trust either.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @ggreenwald
WL documents had little impact, imo, except to kick up dust exactly because of WL strategy plus accountability.
5 replies 1 retweet 6 likes
Uncurated dump; unaccountable intermediary; journalists focused on the gossip candy=undermines actual function of journalism.
-
-
Replying to @zeynep @ggreenwald
MSM sold out. WL's is the only source I currently trust! HRC has been exposed, DNC +++ the rest!
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.