I will try to get around to writing it in paragraphs this week. Emojis might work better though.
-
-
I'll read it. I'm interested. Seems to me something's been lost, & I'm troubled by WL *scheduling* disclosures.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
in the alternate timeline, wikileaks is run by someone who is not a Bond villain and is a force for good
5 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Most anything like this run by unaccountable single dude starts with strong personalites & goes downhill..
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
For me, "Is WL an irresponsible publisher" is more complex than "should irresponsible publishing be allowed"
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
First, it's one person, not an org. He is more than a publisher, but less than a hacker at this point.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep @mattblaze and
Also, I find dumping people's private info uncurated like this unacceptable. It's not necessary.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @mattblaze and
It's done that way because of the ego trip part. Hence the problem.
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
He's deeply flawed and does a lot of damage. But I'm comforted by rules that make that hard to shut down.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @mattblaze @zeynep and
And, of course, my values here are deeply influenced by the first amendment, which doesn't apply where he is.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
One can protect/defend legal rights, still think some acts are wrong and should not be supported.
-
-
Right. I'm totally comfortable with condemning him, but I don't want him shut down.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
seems convoluted though to ask that Ecuador supply wifi as a basic human right. Poor Ecuador, stuck with him
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.