yikes. in 140 chars?
-
-
Replying to @zeynep @mattblaze
use as many emoji as needed! But I’m seriously curious about your opinion, in paragraphs if necessary
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Pinboard @mattblaze
I will try to get around to writing it in paragraphs this week. Emojis might work better though.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
I'll read it. I'm interested. Seems to me something's been lost, & I'm troubled by WL *scheduling* disclosures.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
in the alternate timeline, wikileaks is run by someone who is not a Bond villain and is a force for good
5 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Most anything like this run by unaccountable single dude starts with strong personalites & goes downhill..
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
For me, "Is WL an irresponsible publisher" is more complex than "should irresponsible publishing be allowed"
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
First, it's one person, not an org. He is more than a publisher, but less than a hacker at this point.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep @mattblaze and
Also, I find dumping people's private info uncurated like this unacceptable. It's not necessary.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @mattblaze and
It's done that way because of the ego trip part. Hence the problem.
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Journalism should work within accountable structures; publish should not be "click, dump it all."
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.