Mass flooding of traditional media with hack tidbits—most of which reported poorly, without context—just kicks up dust; drowns politics.
-
-
wikileaks is not properly understood. It's not about journalism, it's activism. See: https://zunguzungu.wordpress.com/2010/11/29/julian-assange-and-the-computer-conspiracy-%E2%80%9Cto-destroy-this-invisible-government%E2%80%9D/ … Maybe needed?
-
.
@dschnaepp I've read all that. I've written about this before. What mass hack defenders are missing, ironically, is how power operates. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Really appreciate your thoughtful threads. Ideas on how we ID (and who IDs) what hacked material is ok to share? Seems a fuzzy line.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
what defines what the public does or does not have the right to know? I'm fearful of people equating hacks with military attacks.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This so much of what's going viral from the Podesta hack. Enormous dust.https://twitter.com/poniewozik/status/787371266143641600 …
-
And this is what it all fits into. Even the things that might have been newsworthy are lost in a cloud of confusion.https://twitter.com/zeynep/status/786990927567024131 …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
that's right, incl. Pentagon Papers= nickname for a single report the Pentagon commissioned on it self to find how it had fucked up.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.