No. It's not exactly the same, but I think a lot about school/ISIS shootings and media. The coverage+
-
-
Replying to @zeynep @ggreenwald and
..should not be on the terms of people undertaking the acts. Manifestos? Summarize, link. Not play on loop.
1 reply 3 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @ggreenwald and
This got dropped and I saw the almost entire press corps literally stop in its tracks. It is enticing.
4 replies 2 retweets 8 likes -
Of course! It's a huge inside look into a major campaign of the likely next president.
1 reply 2 retweets 7 likes -
I agree; it's fascinating. That's why, like any appetite, learning to deal with own interest is important.
2 replies 5 retweets 11 likes -
Do you have a few examples of the most egregious non-stories/wrong-stories from this reporting?
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @ggreenwald @chrislhayes
For example: DOJ collusion and CNN gives questions in advance. Both big stories IF true, but need reporting.
2 replies 2 retweets 10 likes -
Haven't chased (see how hard?) but both emails have explanations besides DOJ and CNN collusion. However+
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
even if we get reporting later that corrects/explains, the allegations have been reported widely with no context.
4 replies 10 retweets 18 likes -
Widely: NPR; Hill; Politico, everyone. If there's DOJ collusion-that's a story in 3 days, too, after investigation.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes
But it's literally like dangling sugar; emails reported on without investigation, without context. It goes viral.
-
-
I don't mean any one outlet; it's pretty much every outlet at this point. Later correction will have no impact.
2 replies 2 retweets 10 likes -
Also seen lots of non-stories. Campaign strategy stuff. I mean, yes, VERY INTERESTING to me too. But historically.
2 replies 3 retweets 9 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.