this is not a discriminate dump of gossipy/internal stuff, not at all
-
-
here allow me to show you some "gossip" https://theintercept.com/2016/10/10/clinton-fracking-theworld/ … https://theintercept.com/2016/10/10/center-for-american-progress-advised-clinton-team-against-15-minimum-wage-leaked-emails-show/ … https://theintercept.com/2016/10/07/excerpts-of-hillary-clintons-paid-speeches-to-goldman-sachs-finally-leaked/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
That story is not exposing corruption. It's literally tiny bit of background to a campaign's public position.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
holding the powerful accountable does not always mean exposing corruption
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
These hacks are destroying most resources of dissent: ability to choose focus, attention, credibility & privacy.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
No, OUR ability to dissent and have journalism that exposes corruption holds the powerful accountable.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @jimbriggs3
it sounds like the word you're looking for is encryption
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @lachancenaomi27
.
@lachancenaomi@zeynep agreed -- in which case we don't get this info that was hacked, restoring secrecy people view as problematic1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I spend a lot of time trying to get activists to use encryption. The powerful will; rest will get hacked.
-
-
Replying to @zeynep
.
@jimbriggs3@lachancenaomi The powerful will find ways to restore their own privacy & secrecy; no sane person will try dissident politics.0 replies 0 retweets 8 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.