Or, consider this: hacks/leaks allow journalists to hold the powerful accountable in a media landscape where only the obsequious get access https://twitter.com/zeynep/status/785980871157227520 …
-
-
this is not a discriminate dump of gossipy/internal stuff, not at all
-
here allow me to show you some "gossip" https://theintercept.com/2016/10/10/clinton-fracking-theworld/ … https://theintercept.com/2016/10/10/center-for-american-progress-advised-clinton-team-against-15-minimum-wage-leaked-emails-show/ … https://theintercept.com/2016/10/07/excerpts-of-hillary-clintons-paid-speeches-to-goldman-sachs-finally-leaked/ …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Coupled with headlines of "SENSATION! PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE HAS STRATEGY TO WIN!"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But what if that internal stuff shows that voters are promised one thing while another is intended?
@jimbriggs3@lachancenaomi -
In another industry, that would be considered fraud.
@jimbriggs3@lachancenaomi - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.