Hear me out. We already had a lot of public info on his treatment of women. But I think normalizing old leaked audio has long-term dangers.
-
-
Yet it appears to have shocked a large number of people who would otherwise not have been as concerned. Doesn't that give it merit?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think litigating people based on secretly recorded private conversations should have a high bar WHEN there is already so much public info.
-
we are well past that point when hacked e-mails of a private citizen make headlines that aren't, "citizen hacked - not good"
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I would normally agree but this was a workplace conversation, while miked, with a bunch of people around him. Seems different.
-
Also, extreme misogyny is a political view.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
it removes cover of the 'i did it for entertainment' excuse that he uses. This was *him* for no reason other than he's awful.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I understand. But as you know the perception that this is scandalous because he didn't realize he was being recorded gives it legs.
-
.
@ASE GOP establishment is not shocked, shocked just realizing who Trump is. Is anyone? Not sure revelation worth the method. Thinking. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think it does. There are women who alleged Trump did the things he describes doing in the tape. They were not believed.
-
Now he has admitted to doing those things. That removes the "well, just allegations" method of brushing it away.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.