This photo headlined the New York Times, changed the course of the war. Would it be buried in a Facebook only world?https://twitter.com/guardiannews/status/774150035932012544 …
-
-
as
@jhagel might argue, automated efficiencies have diminishing returns but a liberal arts education is more important than ever. -
rule by algorithm is the future .. and not a pleasant one
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I doubt most have to evaluate millions of pictures a day... do we expect Facebook to hire an army of editors? : P
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In humanities, people at least handle content(also photographs) as texts, and to read them, _before_ doing anything else with them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
With a global, user-contributed network, not sure there is an alternative to rigid lowest common denominator rules.
-
Of course there is. It's not about lowest common denominator. FB can choose more censorship, or less.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
There's actually a kind of ethnocentrism to automatic assumption that this picture's newsworthiness trumps FB's standard
-
Given discretion, does FB need an editor in every local market to determine what's locally newsworthy or not? => a lot of editors
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"but if we have editorial judgement, we can't as easily abandon any and all moral responsibility like an unwanted child!"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
typical for a high tech company. When stuck, just blame the algorithm, harbinger to future excuses
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.