Will a version with just adapter and $150 cheaper be sold? Asking for a friend with noise-cancelling headphones. https://twitter.com/Anthony/status/773602010742398976 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @zeynep
People prone to surveillance should avoid Bluetooth. I recommend Apple for safety, but activists bulk at cost. No headphone option=win-win.
4 replies 5 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
zeynep tufekci Retweeted Phineas
Ah. Fancy-pants headphones are optional—extra cost. Carry on. Status symbols for most. 1% can hear sound difference.https://twitter.com/Phineas/status/773603412562833408 …
zeynep tufekci added,
1 reply 3 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
Honestly—and
@csoghoian has a TED talk coming on this—Apple is a concern for me now. It *is* the best option for activists but so so pricey.2 replies 2 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
Apple has a great product for security & usability, but those have become luxuries. People who most need security often unable to afford it.
5 replies 15 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
what do you consider a reasonable price for a secure device?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Pinboard
I'd love products in the $300 range; that's what I see most activists end up buying in middle income countries. *sigh*
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like
But the camera quality is a concern too; taking good pictures & video is also important. So not much room to compromise. :-(
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.