I won’t defend misquoting, obvs, but this is an area where the source’s interests are not the same as the journo’s
What is the interest in not letting an academic be precise about their statement? I've seen so many horrible examples.
-
-
I’m talking about in general, not academic-specific — as I said, I’ve let field experts see things in a few cases
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Other reasons email is bad for journos: they are often so marketing-speak that they’re basically unusable
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.