Seems FB kept key components: algorithmically surfacing topics (some form of tf-idf) and algorithmically personalizing list on p(click).
-
-
Replying to @zeynep
The only change is trend descriptions will no longer be writted by humans. They will be less useful but FB can do it faster at bigger scale.
4 replies 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
The "replacing humans" to eliminate bias seems to come from the reporting. I don't think that's the correct interpretation of this change.
4 replies 3 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
disagree, Facebook thinks, and knows people generally agree, that humans = bias, data = objective
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @nathanjurgenson @zeynep
FB is replacing an outside Trending team with FB engineers doing editorial work, not engineers' algorithms, though.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joshuacomer @zeynep
I'm just talking about *perception*. which is engineers do "data/truth", journalists "bias"
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @nathanjurgenson @joshuacomer
Facebook didn't say anything about bias; I think this is more about scaling "trends" globally.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Still employing humans to "vet" the trends; just own engineers rather than (who-knows-who) subcontractors.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep @nathanjurgenson
Doesn't the change occurring amidst controversies about partisan experiences of Trending invite that added context?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joshuacomer @nathanjurgenson
Sure. That's interesting. But as far as I can tell, this will make little difference to that context except..
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
trend "descriptions" won't be written by humans, so that eliminates one source of claim for bias.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.