I suspect the Foundation was very much about Bill Clinton thinking about his legacy on this, as US policy then was frankly unconscionable.
-
-
-
I was thinking this same thing...at least trying to make amends and not painting dogs.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@ThusBloggedA interesting point
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.@t_rivett Cash to whom? The Clintons don't need cash. That makes little sense as to why the Foundation exists. Campaign $$$ go elsewhere.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Present tense historical revisionism? Seems a long throw... More a reflection of one's internal reality than anything else.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He said that actually..he didn't ge25 anything.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@chrislhayes every CGI commitment has to do with a point of failed policy during Bill's terms and later Hillary's time at State -
which is not to say that's a bad thing. CGI commits have one thing *many* global dev progs don't: public accountability
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why the need to focus on a historical failure instead of future good? Let's learn from past not continually rehash it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.