I wrote on the urgency of stepping away from computerized voting before this—but wow. Yeah. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/14/opinion/campaign-stops/the-election-wont-be-rigged-but-it-could-be-hacked.html …https://twitter.com/Snowden/status/765515485706330113 …
-
-
Replying to @zeynep
Read this any way you want. Guessing, informed speculation, sending a message.. Elections are critical & vulnerable.pic.twitter.com/IXmjveahky
2 replies 14 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
People should read these two
@danwallach pieces on@PrincetonCITP blog for specifics: https://freedom-to-tinker.com/blog/dwallach/election-security-as-a-national-security-issue/ … and https://freedom-to-tinker.com/blog/dwallach/a-response-to-the-national-association-of-secretaries-of-state/ … .2 replies 5 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
People saying "open source" election software. I have one word for you: Heartbleed. Blockchain? Nope. Still requires trusting experts.
8 replies 12 retweets 31 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
Fully agree on this! Open source helps pressuring better design decisions re security, but provides no verifiability or auditability
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
Interviewers ask me about Russia hacking voting machines. I find that implausible given US deterrence, but who needs nation-state hackers++
1 reply 10 retweets 6 likes
..when our voting machines have passwords hardwired to "admin" or "abcde"—or run Win 2000? Crashes, lost votes, corrupt locals more likely.
-
-
Replying to @zeynep0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.