I wrote on the urgency of stepping away from computerized voting before this—but wow. Yeah. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/14/opinion/campaign-stops/the-election-wont-be-rigged-but-it-could-be-hacked.html …https://twitter.com/Snowden/status/765515485706330113 …
-
-
Necessary but not sufficient. For elections and other similar applications? No, just no. Stick with paper.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interviewers ask me about Russia hacking voting machines. I find that implausible given US deterrence, but who needs nation-state hackers++
-
..when our voting machines have passwords hardwired to "admin" or "abcde"—or run Win 2000? Crashes, lost votes, corrupt locals more likely.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
People /think/ that!?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is necessary, to provide auditability. Maybe some people confuse that with sufficiency?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.