I wrote on the urgency of stepping away from computerized voting before this—but wow. Yeah. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/14/opinion/campaign-stops/the-election-wont-be-rigged-but-it-could-be-hacked.html …https://twitter.com/Snowden/status/765515485706330113 …
That would require people trust experts, and still be vulnerable. Worst of all possible solutions for elections.
-
-
Also adversarial counting, not voting. It works very well; is fraud proof; does not require trusting experts or black boxes.
-
meant counting of course. black box in many modern democracies are party authorities doing the counting. decentralization avoids it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
everyone can audit their own vote and make sure it was counted properly at any time.
-
This is not a realistic understanding of people. People cannot trust blockchain without a lot of expertise. Not a good idea.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.