ProTip: no one cares about security, they care about what their friends are using.https://twitter.com/bascule/status/760644186701914112 …
-
-
put (human rights) activists in touch with
@accessnow1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Trust me, I've a lot effort with a lot of direct credibility under my belt in this. Problem isn't that.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Unlike tech people's mental modes, most activism is about reaching *other* people, not hiding. Gotta be where folks are.
3 replies 10 retweets 21 likes -
yeah, but when fighting a hostile regime, you still need comsec:pic.twitter.com/HUgy7CJ0HD
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
You won't to change "a hostile regime" in secret. If you have a movement, you're expanding. Hence new people. Hence risk.
2 replies 6 retweets 6 likes -
Don't get me wrong; I think privacy is important for everyone. I encourage secure apps. To protect their personal lives.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
(I exclude China). In most activism, it's the violation of ordinary privacy, not political privacy, that's fixable.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
But ordinary privacy is actually crucial, especially to activists. Personal stuff gets them pressured in horrible ways.
-
-
If I could exchange e2e Snapchat with a world without Signal? For politics: in a heartbeat. (Not for whistleblowing).
1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
@octal also embraced the theoretical appeal of snapchat's message erasure functionality.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.