Why is it controversial Assange won't talk about his sources when reporters regularly do the same in criminal cases?https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/07/31/julian-assange-wont-say-whether-a-foreign-government-was-involved-in-dnc-email-leak/ …
-
-
That may be true, increasingly, generally. But I think Hillary is a special case for him, for better and worse.
@trevortimmThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
i'm not arguing that point - only the question of when reporters think it's now okay for others to divulge sources
-
Not necessarily divulge but source is part of the story; something WL has to consider. No sign it considers public interest.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The intermediary has a responsibility to vet, contextualize, dig in. We saw in Turkey. Just a senseless attempt to jump on news.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.