Forget emails. US voting machines are ridiculously insecure. I wrote once about one with hardwired password "admin".https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/07/27/by-november-russian-hackers-could-target-voting-machines/ …
-
-
some day, America will catch up.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Much of US has adversarial observation. In some scantron states could find irregularities
@SteveBellovin@mattblaze@avirubinThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I've done ballot counting and poll work. It's adversarial--but computers are a *big* problem.
-
right. An adversarial count doesn't accomplish much if the underlying data is compromised.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Well-designed decentralized paper elections scale surprisingly well.
-
I remember no incidents with UK elections in decades. pencil, paper, manual count.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Badly-designed paper elections are twice dangerous: they pave the way for electronic voting.
-
Never thought I'd say this but Turkey is actually well-designed.https://twitter.com/zeynep/status/607549803971649536 …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Turkey also has a wannabe dictator who is supported by the majority. What does that tell u hm?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ireland has similar and rejected e-voting. CS experts were called luddites by politicians.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
)