This. Faux precision in not scientific, it's scientism, just like that Trump "2%" odds he had. He meant "unlikely".https://twitter.com/benjaminwittes/status/757982368779075588 …
-
-
Wouldn't mind it with some explanation, presented as a range, no digit after the period FFS, with some info on how model performed in past.
-
People forget: presidential races are rare events. We don't have that much past data. It's not like state elections. Can't be that precise.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
but it's no different than an algorithmic aggregation of the polls
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.