The files were deleted, after my article.
-
-
You're saying Wikileaks originally hosted them, but then switched to only linking to them?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @christapeterso @lostgen
No, did not ever say hosted. Hosted the nothingburger, ordinary people's emails also revealing private info.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep
Did you look at the "archive"
@lostgen posted? It says you did, is it fake? Link: https://web.archive.org/web/20160726000303/https://trln7wscq2jjwlnl.onion.to/ …2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @christapeterso @lostgen
Last time. Article never said "hosted" to those files; was vague to avoid roadmap. Later update with MORE info./bye
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I'm genuinely confused & just trying to clarify. This is what WL is using to discredit you & it's legitimately confusing.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @christapeterso @lostgen
Okay. The whole thing was in two parts. Emails (no public interest, some private info) and files that dox millions.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Wikileaks hosted emails (of ordinary citizens) & made searchable, AND publicized the files repeatedly to millions.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
So two things; both wrong. They know exactly what they did; the whole thing is an exercise is minor nitpicking.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
These were the files/people they were working with; so should have instead worked to remove, bury & apologize.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
Instead, quickly calls me "Erdogan apologist" (no Google skills), answers nothing, goes on nitpick spree. /end
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.