.@PeterMonnerjahn @Sulliview @TheWorldPost To clarify, yes @wikileaks confirmed NOTHING from database on its site. Different leaks. #AKPLeak
-
-
Replying to @BellaMagnani
You misunderstand. The q is: Is the db
@wikileaks linked to the same as in the RT article?@Sulliview @TheWorldPost2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @PeterMonnerjahn
.
@PeterMonnerjahn@wikileaks@Sulliview @TheWorldPost There's NO link on@wikileaks site to the database in RT article.@zeynep made that up2 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BellaMagnani
You still misunderstand. You said the db
@wikileaks linked to was the same as the one in the RT article. How do you know that?1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @PeterMonnerjahn
.
@PeterMonnerjahn I said the database@zeynep took 4mths to complain about & misattribute to@wikileaks is the one RT wrote about in April1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @BellaMagnani
Yes, I’m aware of that—and that’s what I’ve been asking abt all along. How do you know they’re the same?
@zeynep@wikileaks1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PeterMonnerjahn @BellaMagnani
Don't know why I bother repeating but it's not. I'll end: emails nothing; DB publicized new & dangerous. Bye.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
Thanks, I’m aware of what you said abt that. I was specifically asking
@BellaMagnani to make her explain her claim.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PeterMonnerjahn
Trace the history. This new dump contains the emails that Wikileaks made searchable; it's what they're working with/from.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @PeterMonnerjahn
While everyone nitpicks because I was cautious in providing a roadmap, emails ALSO have private info & no public interest.
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes
The whole thing is indefensible, and speaks volumes to their research "skills." /end
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.