Average CNN nightly viewership was around 400,000 last I checked. Congress Pericope sit-in: 1,000,000 viewers.https://twitter.com/gov/status/745768879801118720 …
-
-
Replying to @zeynep
They worded that carefully. I think they meant tweet impressions.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bluechoochoo
Hmmm, maybe. I've seen livestreams with such large viewership though.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
Totally. Your main point- that livestreams are competitive, is one I completely agree with/advocate.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bluechoochoo
Maybe we'll get better analytics but I find livestream > cable TV totally plausible.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep
Periscope is only livestream platform that doesn't move metric from Viewers to *Views* once stream is over. 1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bluechoochoo @zeynep
But if you add up "Viewers" from their scopes shortly after event concludes, it's decent proxy for "Views." (for that timeframe) 2/2
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bluechoochoo @zeynep
That stat says 'tweets with Periscope have been viewed' which doesn't even imply active attention or plays, right?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I sat on what I think was most popular livestream for 4-5 hours yesterday and never saw it peak above 5k simultaneous
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
.@Chronotope Sure. But totals aso add up via the media ecology. During "Arab Spring", Al Jazeera picked up social media feeds, like CSPAN.
-
-
Replying to @zeynep @Chronotope
At time they tweeted it, based on displayed Viewer count (still visible) I just don't think it got to 1M. 1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Periscope has new option to let recordings stay up. Hope they enabled it. (And Views will grow) 2/2
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
