Why are Democrats so divided? @zeynep on the digital disruption of the party. https://newrepublic.com/article/133776/split#split13 … #TheSplit
-
-
Replying to @followlori
IMO
@zeynep overstates the technological cause. At least as much about the democratization of primaries mid-20th C.@followlori1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AndrewJPerrin @followlori
My argument is that the technological affordances allow fund-raising and messaging; makes threats credible.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep @followlori
I get that. But the outcome is overdetermined- threats seemed credible in prior years w different tech regimes.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AndrewJPerrin @followlori
I thought Dean was the first harbinger threat. Obama actually won against the "invisible primary" candidate.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep @followlori
Jackson '88, T. Kennedy, Kennedy '68, McGovern '72.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AndrewJPerrin @followlori
So, Jackson: no internet; fell short. 68-72 is the previous shake-up that got the "invisible primary" response.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
But, yes, insurgent candidates are the norm in Democratic politics. I think now they can raise real money.
-
-
Replying to @zeynep @followlori
but everyone else is also raising bigger money! Need an account of Internet => $$ that's different for insurgents
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.