The more proactively transparent @Google is about how searches affect results for political candidates, the better.https://twitter.com/mattcutts/status/741329314457624577 …
-
-
Replying to @digiphile
I just wish that we'd had a chance to talk with them to pre-debunk the claims before those folks made a 7 minute video.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @mattcutts @digiphile
Issue here is bigger, though. Forget the specifics of this claim. Google does have this power. The concern is real.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
What is the mechanism to go beyond "trust us" given how consequential auto-complete is? That should be the discussion.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @digiphile
but a discussion like this is *way* out of scope for Twitter's 140 char capsules. Would be happy to talk sometime.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mattcutts @digiphile
I agree that it's not a 140char discussion but would actually like to have this conversation.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
"Not in our interests" not a insufficient answer because I can imagine scenarios that it would be in your interest.+
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
But maybe you mean going beyond "trust us" is in your interests? Would love to talk more about that part.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.