Or, maybe not enough like a pundit, since "models" are least useful when dynamics of low frequency events change.http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-i-acted-like-a-pundit-and-screwed-up-on-donald-trump/ …
Sites like 538 were giving him 2% odds (how do you even compute that?) I don't think that's.. useful.
-
-
I don't think numerical probabilities assigned in August were much use. Analysis that took mechanisms+
-
..into account gave you more insight. Human societies don't work like chemistry projects.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.