But that's partly because *of* Facebook. We're a lot more connected than before (and more migration, too).https://twitter.com/nytimesworld/status/695469168750104576 …
-
-
Replying to @RogueWPA
@GabrielRossman@NAChristakis@barrywellman Yes, sure. I'd wager both shortest & potentially shorter path lengths are altered in FB world.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
@GabrielRossman@NAChristakis@barrywellman FB allows continuing ties that would be lost in 20th century—we moved but had less connectivity.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
@GabrielRossman@NAChristakis@barrywellman Even if we assume stable strong primary network size, meaningful weak tie networks are larger.+1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@GabrielRossman @NAChristakis @barrywellman +And weak ties are integral to Milgram. Also why would a 1953 measure be so stable?
10:40 AM - 5 Feb 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.