@davekarpf @emilybell That is exactly right - but at the very least, the data orients the actions they take and how they spend resources.
-
-
Replying to @kreissdaniel
@kreissdaniel "psychometric data" sounds spicy. But there's no evidence that appending "big five" traits to the voter file does much for you3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @davekarpf
@davekarpf@kreissdaniel Not yet, but it's getting better. Just this is so telling. So much impact with so little.http://www.nature.com/news/facebook-experiment-boosts-us-voter-turnout-1.11401 …2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep
@davekarpf@kreissdaniel If you mean they can't magically convince people... Sure. But knowing who to scare can shape turnout, for ex.4 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
@davekarpf@kreissdaniel This is just starting. Information rich but asymmetric environment; much at stake; lots of money... Will continue.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
@zeynep@kreissdaniel oh it'll definitely continue. But so will the overhyping. This company has made $2.5 MILLION off the Cruz campaign1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @davekarpf
@davekarpf@kreissdaniel So that's the current story and you are probably right. But I think Obama's shaping of turnout was key in 2008.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
@zeynep@kreissdaniel I think internal analytics are WAY more important for campaigns than external analytics.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @davekarpf
@davekarpf@kreissdaniel well internal/external will change too. Obama in-houses; Repubs hire consultants. Agree former more powerful.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
@kreissdaniel @davekarpf I know. :-D
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.