-
-
Replying to @asymmetricinfo
@asymmetricinfo @GrahamDPeterson@epopppp NOPE. Not Twitter. That's what I'm telling you. Works very differently.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @asymmetricinfo
@asymmetricinfo @GrahamDPeterson@epopppp I'm trying to tell you. You had to use Facebook to be connected. Twitter is more a bridge outside.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @asymmetricinfo
@asymmetricinfo @GrahamDPeterson@epopppp Umm, the classic example has long been the fax machine. i.e. exactly that. https://www.utdallas.edu/~liebowit/palgrave/network.html …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
@asymmetricinfo @GrahamDPeterson@epopppp Sorry, I doubt even Facebook is denying network externalities to platform.pic.twitter.com/PnoCwZLdwm
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @asymmetricinfo
@asymmetricinfo @GrahamDPeterson@epopppp FB valuable because of network effects which makes entry by others hard and hence no alternatives.5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
@asymmetricinfo @GrahamDPeterson@epopppp Somewhat related but not NE: FB works well and develops products fast. (Has resources).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@asymmetricinfo @GrahamDPeterson @epopppp The "no viable alternatives" is direct growth of NE. Can't budge people abaseline user only there.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.