a spotify for web publishing? a proposal from @zeynep: https://medium.com/message/spotify-but-for-the-titanic-a-proposal-for-the-future-of-news-and-publishing-40c41fbebe7b …
-
-
Replying to @nathanjurgenson
dont agree spotify for publishing is the answer. spotify made listening to all-the-music easy. reading all-the-sites is already easy
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @nathanjurgenson
a spotify-for-publishing would put so much power in the hands of that spotify-like service! worse than existing models
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @nathanjurgenson
who decides how spotify-for-publishing doles out subscription money? proposal is good for the big legacy sites who are fine anyways
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nathanjurgenson
@nathanjurgenson Sorry just saw this. Suggestion wasn't Spotify as is. It was: don't let Apple etc be Spotify and take over this function.+1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep
@nathanjurgenson But I propose pay per read, but pennies, shed seamlessly, pubs charge rate, one-time approval. Key is ease of use.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
@nathanjurgenson No 30 different logins. The only thing unifying is a payment system. Join once, approve pub's set rate once, done.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nathanjurgenson
@zeynep 2, publishers would have to take away read-everything from consumers (unlike spotify which made that easier) - would upset readers1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nathanjurgenson
@nathanjurgenson Anyone who wants in and isn't malware should get in. It's just a payment system. The reader has to approve each site--once.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@nathanjurgenson They're otherwise mostly going to go bankrupt, save largest ones, or Apple is going to take 30%. Them's the options.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.