@zeynep they already survey; what you describe would result in less info for most of them.
-
-
Replying to @derekwillis
@derekwillis Yes! That's my goal, less of my info with them. :-D Why do they need more of my info if they are financially okay through subs.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @derekwillis
@derekwillis Now, none. I am speculating about a model where they move away from ad-based to some sort of publisher-owned Spotify model.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
@derekwillis To entice people to join it should be: 1-One payment, once 2-Smooth experience (browser extension) 3-Privacy preserving.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @derekwillis
@zeynep i mean, i agree in concept, but the market you describe doesn't exist & if it did, it would compete with others with ad $.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @derekwillis
@derekwillis Classic collective action problem. If they all got together and created their own Spotify, and really paywall. It could work.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @derekwillis
@derekwillis Sure, but give us one service. A penny or two per article something straightforward, if there's surcharge, one click dismiss.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@derekwillis This could be worked out. $10 per month, access to many many sites, penny per reading, 10% overage deducted from next month...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.