@kreissdaniel @dfreelon @zeynep @ajungherr difference btwn answering a question WITH Twitter data or asking a q ABOUT Twitter the medium.
-
-
Replying to @emilythorson
@emilythorson@kreissdaniel@dfreelon@ajungherr But even there; say what goes viral on Twitter. CANNOT be studied by Twitter alone.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep
@emilythorson@kreissdaniel@dfreelon@ajungherr All these studies on virality and influence on Twitter ignore the fact it's the ecology.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
@emilythorson@kreissdaniel@dfreelon@ajungherr I struggle to find too many interesting Qs to ask ONLY Twitter data, even about Twitter use2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
@zeynep@emilythorson@kreissdaniel@ajungherr Not sure I agree with this, but do agree we should match RQs to data.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dfreelon
@zeynep@emilythorson@kreissdaniel@ajungherr (Of course I'm not a disinterested party!)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dfreelon
@dfreelon@emilythorson@kreissdaniel@ajungherr When you guys look at say Syria data, you work with people who understand much more.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep
@dfreelon@emilythorson@kreissdaniel@ajungherr I don't think you could make sane sense of it all if you didn't also follow other mediums.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
@zeynep@dfreelon@kreissdaniel@ajungherr Definitely agree. Tho I often think the same thing about research that uses only NYT data.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emilythorson
@emilythorson@dfreelon@kreissdaniel@ajungherr NYT data was good for, say, agenda setting when mass media dominated.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@emilythorson @dfreelon @kreissdaniel @ajungherr Now, it's still useful but it's no longer as strongly agenda setting so need more mediums.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.