. @PatrickBoyd01 @jbeeskow Chrysler recalling 1.4M vehicles will be expensive. The cost of a secure development program pales in comparison.
-
-
Replying to @jwgoerlich
@jwgoerlich is it only about sec dev or does it involve choices in architecture & assurance procedures that do entail higher costs?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Aristot73
@Aristot73 Interesting question. Would sec dev alone have caught the vulnerability? Or would a higher level architecture review be needed?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jwgoerlich
@jwgoerlich see section 7.2 of this paper quoted in@USCERT_gov advisory http://www.autosec.org/pubs/cars-usenixsec2011.pdf … cc@pjcoylepic.twitter.com/QRfkV8T4Yr
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Aristot73
@Aristot73@jwgoerlich@USCERT_gov@pjcoyle I link to that paper from my piece!
It's been 4 years, littlec change. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/11/opinion/zeynep-tufekci-why-smart-objects-may-be-a-dumb-idea.html …1 reply 2 retweets 1 like
@Aristot73 @jwgoerlich @USCERT_gov @pjcoyle Ah, just realized the sentence linking to that paper was cut for length. But, yeah!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.