How do articles like this get away w/ not even mentioning possible selection bias? It invites bad #scicomm.http://www.nature.com/srep/2015/150709/srep11610/full/srep11610.html#t …
-
-
Replying to @thosjleeper
@thosjleeper Also, list-wise deletion would have lost 73% of the sample. Okay, list-wise deletion sucks, but so does 73% missing values.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
@thosjleeper So I looked. I'm all for multiple imputation but no way is income, anxiety, migraine or addiction missing at random there.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@thosjleeper Also not obesity and heart disease. Nor Fruit or vegetable number. Wowze. Very good reason all those NOT missing at random.
6:20 AM - 10 Jul 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.