@makmanalp @zeynep if the reading of someone's argument rests on the precise use of a single word, then the argument isn't being read.
-
-
Replying to @makmanalp
@makmanalp@zeynep but the use of "terrorism" (or not) is problematic not because of language per-se, but because it's used as a weapon.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @makmanalp
@blaine@zeynep "Algorithms" know you're gay before you do, "Algorithms" know what you do! It takes away responsibility from programmers.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @makmanalp
@blaine@zeynep if a company doesn't soon argue in a lawsuit "it wasn't us, it was the algorithm", I'll eat my hat!2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @makmanalp
@makmanalp@zeynep I have some hats for you. Any engineering team who claims to know exactly what their algorithms do is lying*.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @makmanalp
@makmanalp@zeynep I sure hope it does (look at my bio) ;)2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @blaine
@blaine@makmanalp hahaha. touché. That's exactly the complexity we need to communicate, though. This is more like architecture design.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@blaine @makmanalp Programmers structure complexity, but there's rarely an overall eye on the impacts in the wild. Often not possible. Hard.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.