@n_stenhou @florianederer It's also obviously not "nigh impossible" to change people's beliefs. Especially clear on this issue.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@n_stenhou@florianederer It's just that this data doesn't exist.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@florianederer@n_stenhou The study doesn't exist. It's non-existence =/= you can't change people's mind. Straightforward.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@florianederer@n_stenhou Literature makes it hard to believe a single contact would be that important. So that turns out correct.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@florianederer@n_stenhou Okay, I was reacting to your tweet, which is admittedly in shorthand.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@florianederer@n_stenhou To be more precise: Single encounter likely to make substantive change in opinion to many people? Yeah, nope.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@florianederer@n_stenhou But, of course, even single encounter will change some minds... Question is how substantive an effect to expect?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@florianederer@n_stenhou And that probably depends on the direction culture is already pushing—wasn't implausible in gay marriage.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@n_stenhou@florianederer Hope that null results & independent confirmation of prior results valued over (unlikely) novel findings. *laughs* -
@n_stenhou@florianederer though actually *cries*. "We may be headed for disaster" prescient. http://asq.sagepub.com/content/60/2/179.full …pic.twitter.com/x6ETjDztx9
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.