Just read the Science FB article http://www.sciencemag.org/content/early/2015/05/08/science.aaa1160.full … 1) def. selected on the D. 2) interesting findings but 3) Science material? Really?
-
-
Replying to @davekarpf
@davekarpf I also find it funny how they talk about the FB algorithm, like it's this weird mysterious thing and they don't work there1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dfreelon
@dfreelon yep yep.@davidlazer's response piece makes that point quite well, I think.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @davekarpf
@davekarpf@davidlazer I understand their hands were tied on that, but it made for really funny reading4 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @dfreelon
@dfreelon @davekarpf Buried some interesting stuff, too.https://medium.com/message/how-facebook-s-algorithm-suppresses-content-diversity-modestly-how-the-newsfeed-rules-the-clicks-b5f8a4bb7bab …
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.