Sample quality is relative. Can always say "you should studied population X" & no matter how good the sample, it's now biased wrt that pop.
-
-
@MichelleNMeyer@seanjtaylor That said, 100% random for representing a large body is pretty rare, brings in missing at random discussions.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@zeynep@seanjtaylor course study analyzing text couldn't have been done w/users who produced no text. So results perhaps not gen to lurkers -
@MichelleNMeyer@seanjtaylor Right. Truly 100% random representation is super rare for large enough body of anything.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.