-
-
Replying to @deaneckles
@deaneckles@eszter Puzzling & worrisome because the study is fine if presented properly but distorted—in alignment with corporate PR needs?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @deaneckles
@deaneckles@zeynep you must have a very different baseline to compare to then2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @deaneckles
@deaneckles@eszter@zeynep Research involves trade-offs. Sample is one of those. The paper states sampling procedures in 2nd paragraph.2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @thosjleeper
@thosjleeper@deaneckles@eszter That is not at all the question. Of course research involves trade-offs. Did you read the concluding graph?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep
@zeynep Yes. What would you have had them say differently (in <4500 words, and that wasn't said elsewhere in article)?@deaneckles@eszter2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thosjleeper
@thosjleeper Uh... de-emphasize the sample size, while emphasizing the selection and percentage selected.@zeynep@deaneckles@eszter1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @niftyc
@niftyc@zeynep@deaneckles@eszter I have a blog post coming up that responds to a lot of your critiques. Just a heads up. Will tweet link.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@thosjleeper @niftyc @deaneckles @eszter Check the coverage which confirms what we say about the misleading framing.pic.twitter.com/kSBG37amQB
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.