@zeynep Not sure it’s either-or. Systems can be built in to foil the latter. This (albeit in German) is excellent http://j.mp/1Cd7VwK
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@dtchimp But it would introduce a whole host of new ones. You have humans who can override because quirks, emergencies, bugs...
-
@zeynep @dtchimp Potentially on a much larger scale.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@EmilyDreyfuss I'm fairly overloaded, but you can always email zeynep at technosociology dot org. Someone should. :-)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@zeynep will lead to calls for "can be controlled from ground". Then: "OMG CAN BE CONTROLLED BY TERRORISTS FROM GROUND". -
@charlesarthur@zeynep Because, of course, it is only a 'door issue'. And sufficient technological sophistication can lead to zero risk... - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@zeynep You could have a rule that says 2 people must be in cockpit at all times. Not perfect but may thwart suicidal pilot. -
.
@ChipFaust Maybe but captain pilot was in the cockpit during final phase of Egypt Air 990 crash. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EgyptAir_Flight_990 … - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@dtchimp While increasing other risks... Space of wicked problems.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@dtchimp
@DavidJandura If you have any amount of human override, you introduce the human element. Once you do, here we are.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.